Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study examines how speakers on certain TV interview programs resolve problems of agreement with formally singular epicene antecedents. The form most frequently used isthey, althoughhedoes appear fairly often. Some forms found in written English hardly occur. It appears thattheyis not used simply to avoid a commitment to gender. Rather, three factors appear to contribute to speakers' choice of pronominal: presuppositions about gender roles associated with the referent, notional number of the referent, and the extent to which the referent can be posited as a specific individual. The idea that there is a gap in third person singular pronouns in spoken English is criticized. (Pronominal gender, agreement, semantics, usage, English)
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Language and Linguistics
Reference54 articles.
1. Anaphora by pronouns;Wiese;Linguistics,1983
2. Sex role imagery and the use of generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology;Schneider;The American Sociologist,1973
3. The Tribunal of Use: Agreement in Indefinite Constructions
4. Sexist Grammar Revisited
5. Toward a theory of anaphoric processing
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献