Author:
Ana Otto Santa,Parodi Claudia
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis article proposes a comprehensive model of the SPEECH COMMUNITY in sociolinguistics that reworks Labov's model, which has been criticized as being restrictive. Fieldork in non-metropolitan Mexico demonstrates the utility of our model, which can be applied across both urban and non-urban domains. It is compatible with the Milroys' central mechanism for the description of individual speech usage and group cohesion or susceptibility to change in terms of the social network. Based on linguistic variable types, this model has a hierarchy of four nested fields (speech community configurations) into which each individual is placed, according to his/her demonstrated recognition of the social evaluation associated with the variables. At the most local configuration, speakers demonstrate no knowledge of generally stigmatized variables; in the second, speakers register an awareness of stigmatized variables; in the third, an awareness of stigmatized and regional variables; and in the fourth, speakers model standard variants over regional ones. This model classifies the kinds of sociolinguistic variables that are pertinent in this social setting and also provides a structured manner for dealing with dialect contact dynamics. (Speech community, social network, Spanish, Mexico, dialect, diffusion, variables.)
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Language and Linguistics
Reference82 articles.
1. Blau Peter M. . (1987) Contrasting theoretical perspectives. In Alexander (eds.), 71–85.
2. Paul Garvin, ed., Method and theory in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 1970. Pp. 336.
3. Method and Theory in Linguistics
4. Multilingualism in its Social Context in Aboriginal North America
5. Alexander Jeffrey C. , & Giesen Bernhard (1987). From reduction to linkage: The long view of the micro-macro debate. In Alexander (eds.), 1–42.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献