Abstract
“Some shops use an apostrophe, wrongly, to indicate an plural (‘pea's’), but will generally omit the apostrophe when one is actually required (‘new seasons asparagus’), a phenomenon sometimes referred to as the greengrocer's (or grocer's) apostrophe. Try to avoid this.” (Marsh & Hodsdon (eds), 2008: 5)In this article, I shall examine a range of evidence from printed and web-based sources to gauge the extent of interest in punctuation, and the kinds of discourse employed in discussion of these matters. I shall also compare this with the comparative lack of attention paid to punctuation by 18th-century ‘prescriptivists’. I shall also consider why prescriptivism has returned with such a vengeance in the 21st century, and why punctuation is a focus of attention.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Filled-in petition forms and hand-drafted petitions to the Foundling Hospital;Current Issues in Linguistic Theory;2024-04-15
2. ‘The night before beg'd ye queens's pardon and his brother's’: the apostrophe in the history of English;English Language and Linguistics;2023-11-24
3. Prescription and taboo;The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Prescriptivism;2023-03-14
4. Grassroots prescriptivism;The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Prescriptivism;2023-03-14
5. Usage guides as a text type;The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Prescriptivism;2023-03-14