1. Bracke M, Edwards S, Geers R, O’Connell N, Pedersen LJ and Valros A 2011. Sub-report E - The risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking. In Preparatory work for the future development of animal based measures for assessing the welfare of weaned, growing and fattening pigs including aspects related to space allowance, floor types, tail biting and need for tail docking (ed. H Spoolder, M Bracke, C Mueller-Graf, and S Edwards), pp. 84–98. EFSA.
2. Attitudes of Dutch pig farmers towards tail biting and tail docking;Bracke;Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,2013
3. Indirect genetic effects for growth rate in domestic pigs alter aggressive and manipulative biting behaviour;Camerlink;Behavior Genetics,2015
4. A postal survey of tail biting in pigs in South-West England;Chambers;Veterinary Record,1995
5. Effects of stocking density and environmental enrichment on behavior and fecal corticosteroid levels of pigs under commercial farm conditions;Cornale;Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research,2015