Abstract
AbstractLiberal egalitarian political philosophers have often argued that private property is a legal convention dependent on the state and that complaints about taxation from entitlement theorists are therefore based on a conceptual mistake. But our capacity to grasp and use property concepts seems too embedded in human nature for this to be correct. This essay argues that many standard arguments that property is constitutively a legal convention fail, but that the opposition between conventionalists and natural rights theorists is outmoded. In doing this, the essay draws on recent literature in evolutionary biology and psychology. Even though modern property in a complex society involves legal conventions, those conventions should be sensitive to our natural dispositions concerning ownership.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference37 articles.
1. Property rights and the resolution of social conflict
2. Effects of Ownership Rights on Conflicts Between Toddler Peers;Ross;Infancy,2012
3. First Possession Beyond the Law: Adults' and Young Children's Intuitions About Ownership;Friedman;Tulane Law Review,2009
4. Pierson v. Post, 3 Cai. R. 175, 2 Am. Dec. 264 (N.Y. 1805)
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Citizens with Benefits;Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume;2022-05-31
2. Against Kantian Statism;The Journal of Politics;2021-10-01
3. Property, Legitimacy, Ideology: A Reality Check;The Journal of Politics;2021-04-23
4. The early modern “creation” of property and its enduring influence;European Journal of Political Theory;2019-11-10
5. Legal Ownership Is Psychological: Evidence from Young Children;Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior;2018