Abstract
Whether morality has rational authority is an open question insofar as we can seriously entertain conceptions of morality and practical reason according to which it need not be contrary to reason to fail to conform to moral requirements. Doubts about the authority of morality are especially likely to arise for those who hold a broadly prudential view of rationality. It is common to think of morality as including various other-regarding duties of cooperation, forbearance, and aid. Most of us also regard moral obligations as authoritative practical considerations. But heeding these obligations appears sometimes to constrain the agent's pursuit of his own interests or aims. If we think of rationality in prudential terms–as what would promote the agent's own interests–we may wonder whether moral conduct is always rationally justifiable. Indeed, we do not need to think of rationality in exclusively prudential terms to raise this worry. The worry can arise even if there are impartial reasons–that is, nonderivative reasons to promote the welfare of others.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference26 articles.
1. The Great Cerebral Commissure;Perry;Scientific American,1964
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Types of Identity and Coordinates of Person;Epistemology & Philosophy of Science;2023
2. Altruism: Stability-Based Sorting;Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior;2022-12-08
3. Courage in Aristotle’s Theory of the Good;The Journal of Value Inquiry;2022-09-21
4. FRIENDSHIP AND THE WISHES OF THE DEAD;Legal Theory;2022-05-23
5. Metaphysical Egoism and Personal Identity;The Journal of Value Inquiry;2021-01-04