Abstract
Writers of very different persuasions have relied on arguments about self-ownership; in recent years, it is libertarians who have rested their political theory on self-ownership, but Grotian authoritarianism rested on similar foundations, and, even though it matters a good deal that Hegel did not adopt a full-blown theory of self-ownership, so did Hegel's liberal-conservatism. Whether the high tide of the idea has passed it is hard to say. One testimony to its popularity was the fact that G. A. Cohen for a time thought that the doctrine of self-ownership was so powerful that an egalitarian like himself had to come to terms with it; but he has since changed his mind. I have tackled the topic of self-ownership glancingly elsewhere, but have not hitherto tried to pull together the observations I have made in passing on those occasions. The view I have taken for granted and here defend is that self-ownership is not an illuminating notion—except in contexts that are unattractive to anyone of libertarian tastes.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference27 articles.
1. Kant , The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, pp. 60–67.
2. Libertarianism, postlibertarianism, and the welfare state: Reply to Friedman
3. Locke , Two Treatises of Government, Second Treatise
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Dimensions and variables;Cosmopolitanism, State Sovereignty and International Law and Politics;2023-07-10
2. Agents and players;Cosmopolitanism, State Sovereignty and International Law and Politics;2023-07-10
3. Body Ownership;Emergent Medicine and the Law;2021
4. Property and capital in the person: Lockean and neoliberal self‐ownership;Constellations;2019-07-12
5. CONNECTED SELF-OWNERSHIP AND OUR OBLIGATIONS TO OTHERS;Social Philosophy and Policy;2019