Abstract
AbstractStandard methods for measuring latent traits from categorical data assume that response functions are monotonic. This assumption is violated when individuals from both extremes respond identically, but for conflicting reasons. Two survey respondents may “disagree” with a statement for opposing motivations, liberal and conservative justices may dissent from the same Supreme Court decision but provide ideologically contradictory rationales, and in legislative settings, ideological opposites may join together to oppose moderate legislation in pursuit of antithetical goals. In this article, we introduce a scaling model that accommodates ends against the middle responses and provide a novel estimation approach that improves upon existing routines. We apply this method to survey data, voting data from the U.S. Supreme Court, and the 116th Congress, and show that it outperforms standard methods in terms of both congruence with qualitative insights and model fit. This suggests that our proposed method may offer improved one-dimensional estimates of latent traits in many important settings.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference52 articles.
1. UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the U.K. House of Commons
2. Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement.
3. The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate
4. Jackman, S. 2017. “pscl: Classes and Methods for R Developed in the Political Science Computational Laboratory.” R package version 1.5.2. Sydney: United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pscl.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献