Abstract
Correct identification of fossil taxa is immensely important for dating molecular phylogenies and understanding when and how quickly modern biodiversity evolved. Fossils that are available for a clade of interest and can be directly incorporated in the phylogenetic analysis are considered primary sources of time calibration, whereas calibrations inferred from other studies are secondary (Arroyave et al., 2013). Studies of taxonomic groups that lack fossils must either expand their analyses to include fossilized outgroup lineages, use secondary calibrations, or use more problematic primary calibrations, e.g., vicariant geologic events. The use of vicariant geologic events to calibrate phylogenies poses the risk of circular reasoning, because the goal of many such studies is to determine how geologic events have affected diversification. Near et al. (2012) argued that fossil calibrations external to clades of interest, but still within the broader Actinopterygian (ray-finned fishes) tree, could be used as means of calibrating a generalized molecular clock, but internal calibrations are still valuable for refining such inferences (Arroyave et al., 2013).
Funder
American Museum of Natural History
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference34 articles.
1. Preliminary notes on South American Nematognathi;Eigenmann;Proceedings of the California Academy of Science (ser. 2),1889
2. Caracídeos fósseis da Bacia do Paraíba;Travassos;Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências,1955
3. Considerações sobre alguns peixes Terciários dos schistos de Taubaté, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil;Woodward;Revista do Museu Paulista, São Paulo,1898
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献