Abstract
This comment on Chaim Saiman's illuminating comparison between rabbinic and Christian approaches to religious texts that are in some sense authoritative focuses on what we can fairly infer from the sharp difference he describes. I believe there is much more to be said on this fascinating topic, and I now write with large gaps in my understanding of relevant subjects. I concentrate here on the question whether the Christian view that Professor Saiman describes actually has strong logical implications for what one should regard as desirable interpretive and legislative strategies for the (secular) law of large diverse societies. On that crucial point, I am more skeptical than Saiman appears to be.I begin with a few preliminary observations, and then pose some other questions about connections between religious perspectives and views about ordinary legal interpretation before tackling my main topic.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference5 articles.
1. Jesus' Legal Theory—A Rabbinic Reading
2. Reflections on Christian Jurisprudence;Greenawalt;Teachings of Modern Christianity
3. Dead to the Law:” Paul's Antinomianism;Waldron;Cardozo L. Rev.,2006
4. Jewish Legal Theory and American Constitutional Theo?: Some Comparisons and Contrasts;Levine;Hastings Const. L.Q.,1997
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献