Can policy forums overcome echo chamber effects by enabling policy learning? Evidence from the Irish climate change policy network

Author:

Wagner Paul M.,Ylä-Anttila Tuomas

Abstract

AbstractResearch has repeatedly shown that individuals and organisations tend to obtain information from others whose beliefs are similar to their own, forming “echo chambers” with their network ties. Echo chambers are potentially harmful for evidence-based policymaking as they can hinder policy learning and consensus building. Policy forums could help alleviate the effects of echo chambers if organisations with different views were to participate and to use the opportunities that forums provide to learn from those outside their networks. Applying exponential random graph models on survey data of the Irish climate change policy network, we find that policy actors do indeed tend to obtain policy advice from those whose beliefs are similar to their own. We also find that actors tend not to obtain policy advice from the those that they encounter at policy forums, suggesting forums are not enabling policy learning.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration

Reference61 articles.

1. Likert: Functions to Analyze and Visualize Likert Type Items;Bryer;R Package Version,2016

2. Trends, Frames and Discourse Networks: Analysing the Coverage of Climate Change in Irish Newspapers;Wagner;Irish Journal of Sociology,2017

3. Sabatier, PA Jenkins-Smith, HC (1999) The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In Sabatier A (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 117–166.

4. Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks;Gerber;American Journal of Political Science,2013

5. Henry, Adam Douglas (2016) Network Segregation and Policy Learning. In Victor JN, Montgomery AH and Lubell M (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3