Abstract
ABSTRACTGovernments increasingly use quantitative policy signals as automatic triggers for policy adjustments rather than simply to inform policy debate. This increased use of policy triggers cannot be explained simply by a technocratic desire to reduce workloads and regularize policy adjustments. Political objectives – notably desires to reduce conflict, bind future policymakers, and avoid blame – play an important role both in decisions to use policy triggers and in the selection of specific triggers. Using policy signals as triggers often leads to the politicization of statistics and to harmful rigidification of policy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration
Reference71 articles.
1. The Deficit and the Public Interest
2. Mismeasuring Poverty and Progress;Weicher;Cato Journal,1987
3. Provision Authorizing OMB to Define Poverty Sparks Partisan Fight in Congress;Wehr;Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report,1981
4. The Politics of Blame Avoidance
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献