Abstract
AbstractThe literature has described trade unions’ positions towards both precarious workers and migrant workers as ambivalent. By studying an extreme case, the meat-processing industries in the United Kingdom and in Germany, we show how trade unions were decisive in both countries in bringing exploitative working conditions on the political agenda and in advancing policy change. However, the strategies through which trade unions contributed to this differed remarkably, highlighting different causal pathways in both countries. The British case can clearly be seen as an example of successful union revitalisation by relying on innovative strategies. In contrast, the German story exhibits a strong reliance on a more traditional approach to improving workers’ rights, which was only successful after employers were willing to improve working conditions in the sector as well. Our analysis shows that policy change can happen despite unfavourable conditions and weak actors, especially if these actors make strategic use of situational conditions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration
Reference75 articles.
1. Private Animal Welfare Standards—Opportunities and Risks
2. NGG (2016) Sozialdumping beenden - Arbeit in der Schlachtbranche neu ordnen. https://www.ngg.net/pressemitteilungen/2016/4-quartal/19-10-chg/ (accessed 26 February 2020).
3. The Structural Invisibility of Outsiders: The Role of Migrant Labour in the Meat-Processing Industry
4. British Meat Processors Association (2017) EU Workers are a Key Ingredient in the British Meat Industry. http://britishmeatindustry.org/industry-news/eu-workers-are-a-key-ingredient-in-the-british-meat-industry/ (accessed 16 April 2018).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献