Abstract
AbstractDespite widespread acknowledgement of the dangers of selective subsidisation, government support to business remains common practice. Looking at State aid allocations in the European Union, the article explores why some countries grant more aid than others. Scholarship has failed to address this issue in a comprehensive manner, focusing either on the responsiveness of governments to voters’ preferences or on the use of subsidies as a way to ensure the political survival of the incumbent. Using the lens of distributive politics, this article proposes a more comprehensive account of State aid politics that joins these two perspectives. By means of time-series cross-section regression analysis, it tests how aid allocation depends on the attainment of policy goals (namely correction of market failures), electoral pragmatism and responsibility towards international commitments. The results show that politicians are indeed electorally pragmatic, but not necessarily responsive, due to institutional constraints and international commitments.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration
Reference118 articles.
1. Achen, CH (2000) Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables. In Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, July 20–22.
2. Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas
3. Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers?
4. How Adaptable is the European Commission? The Case of State Aid Regulation
5. Johnson, JW and Wallack, JS (2012) Electoral Systems and the Personal Vote Database, https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:1902.1/17901 (accessed 16 April 2018).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献