Capturing Quality?: The Quality Issue in British and American Health Policies

Author:

Pollitt Christopher

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe quality of health care services has recently become a prominent political issue in both Britain and America. Everyone is in favour of quality. Yet closer inspection reveals that the term is being used with several different meanings, and that its fashionability seems intimately connected with the collision, in both countries, between rising health care costs and a desire on the part of the purchasers or paymasters of health services to restrict their expenditures. The different approaches to assessing quality are not neutral, technical matters. Each carries implications for the future relationships among health care providers, and between providers, payers and patients. Furthermore, changes in these institutional relationships may well lead the debate back to the larger, traditional and more obviously ‘political’ issues of resource allocation, equity and the role of the state.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration

Reference63 articles.

1. Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.

2. Thompson Andrew (1983) The measurement of patients perceptions of hospital care, Ph.D thesis (unpublished) submitted to the Department of Management Science, University of Manchester.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Управління якістю надання публічних послуг;Проблеми сучасних трансформацій. Серія: право, публічне управління та адміністрування;2023-10-23

2. Systematically evaluating the impact of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) on health care delivery: A matrix of ethical implications;Health Policy;2014-04

3. Events, Public Discourses and Responsive Government: Quality Assurance in Health Care in England, Sweden and Japan;Journal of Public Policy;2010-11-04

4. Maintaining Quality in Human Services;Social Policy & Administration;1994-03

5. Outcome audit in plastic surgery: the Cambridge Classification;British Journal of Plastic Surgery;1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3