Comparative susceptibility to anthelmintics ofBrugia pahangiin jirds infected by different methods

Abstract

ABSTRACTIt is possible to infect jirds withBrugia pahangiby three methods. Infective larvae (L3) can be injected either intraperitoneally (ip), when adults develop in the peritoneal cavity, or sub-cutaneously (sc), when they develop in the lymphatics or the heart and blood vessels associated with the lungs. Alternatively adult worms which have been grown in the peritoneal cavities of jirds can be implanted into the peritoneal cavities of other jirds. This latter system has been widely used for screening for new filaricides. We have compared the activity of 9 macrofilaricidal compounds against these 3 types of infection. Mebendazole and albendazole were more active against implanted adults than against L3 induced adults in the peritoneal cavity. Oxibendazole, flubendazole, CGP24588A and oxfendazole were equally active against both types of worm. CGP20376, Mel Ga and Mel Ni were more active against adult worms derived from inoculated L3 than implanted worms. When comparing intra-lymphatic and ip adults (both derived from L3 infections and in the same jirds) albendazole and CGP20376 were active at the same levels against both types of infection. Mebendazole, flubendazole, oxfendazole, CGP24588A, Mel Ga and Mel Ni were more active against ip adults than intra-lymphatic adults. No drug was more active against intra-lymphatic adults than against adults.