Abstract
AbstractThe relationship of the bourgeoisie and democratisation has been inconsistent across the history of democracy. This work offers an alternative explanation taking the example of the Thai middle class, which had promoted democracy, turned against it. From the democratic transition of 1973 until the present day, the Thai middle class has played contradictory roles in the democratisation of the country. This work investigates the effects of democratic institution-building after regime change and the efforts to consolidate democracy in the middle class. This work proposes two major observations. The first is the failure of the middle class to establish themselves in democratic institutions and processes in either the legislature/executive, political parties, local government or structured interest groups. They have learned of the uncertainty of free elections and how the elected executives have benefitted other classes but not them. The second regards the missing prerequisite of democracy. Insufficient understanding of majority rules and two-turnover elections, caused the middle class who were disappointed with the outcome of democratic regimes and systems to easily turn away from democracy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Anthropology,Geography, Planning and Development,Cultural Studies
Reference106 articles.
1. Chan Heng, Chee . 1993 “Democracy: Evolution and implementation.” In Democracy and Capitalism: Asian and American Perspectives, edited by Robert Bartley, Chan Heng Chee, Samuel P. Huntington, and Shijuro Ogata, 1–26. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
2. Towards consolidating democracy: The paradoxical role of democracy groups in Thailand;Quigley;Democratization,1996
3. Article of faith: The failure of royal liberalism in Thailand;Connors;Journal of Contemporary Asia,2008a
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献