Author:
Ding Ya,Peterson Jeffrey M.
Abstract
This research analyzes two groundwater conservation policies in the Kansas High Plains located within the Ogallala aquifer: 1) cost-share assistance to increase irrigation efficiency; and 2) incentive payments to convert irrigated crop production to dryland crop production. To compare the cost-effectiveness of these two policies, a dynamic model simulated a representative irrigator's optimal technology choice, crop selection, and irrigation water use over time. The results suggest that the overall water-saving effectiveness can be improved when different policy tools are considered under different conditions. High prevailing crop prices greatly reduce irrigators' incentive to give up irrigation and therefore cause low enrollment and ineffectiveness of the incentive payment program. In areas with low aquifer-saturated thickness, the incentive payment program is more effective, whereas in areas with relatively higher water availability, the cost-share program could be a better choice.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference26 articles.
1. Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use
2. United Department of Energy. Energy Information Administration. Internet site: www.eia.gov (Accessed September 6, 2011).
3. Rogers D.H. , and Alam M. . Comparing Irrigation Energy Costs. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Irrigation Management Series, MF-2360, January 1999.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献