Author:
Bansal Sangeeta,Chakravarty Sujoy,Ramaswami Bharat
Abstract
AbstractMuch of the debate between the European and US positions about the labeling of genetically modified (GM) foods has been whether consumers perceive labels as a source of information or as a signal to change behavior. In this paper we provide an experimental framework for examining these roles of information and signaling. While previous studies have focused on the impact of labels on consumer behavior, our interest is also in what happens prior to the expression of aversion to GM-labeled foods. In particular, the experiment design allows the researcher to estimate a lower bound of the informational impact of labels on GM food aversion. The other novel feature of this paper is that, unlike earlier studies, it uses subjects from a developing country.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Environmental Science,Development
Reference26 articles.
1. Associated Press (2002), White House opposes biotech labels, [Available at] http://askwaltstollmd.com/archives/genefoods/113169.html.
2. Inserting GM Products into the Food Chain: The Market and Welfare Effects of Different Labeling and Regulatory Regimes
3. Kirchhoff S. and A. Zago (2001), ‘A simple model of voluntary vs mandatory labeling of GMOs’, Working Paper No. 07/01, Instituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria, Rome.
4. Do consumers not care about biotech foods or do they just not read the labels?
5. Chapter 10 Consumer Preferences for Genetically Modified Food
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献