Abstract
AbstractThis article examines how smart courts enhance the reform of judicial responsibility and the “trial supervision and management” mechanism. It holds that smart courts, while meant to provide better judicial services and improve access to justice, have the additional goal of enhancing the restructuring of accountability and power structures. It argues that automation and digitization help institutionalize and codify political supervision. Smart courts help resolve tension between the two opposing requirements of Chinese courts to maintain legal rationality and independent adjudication on the one hand, and the need for flexibility to allow intervention on the other. This article provides an account of the automation of “trial supervision and management” and explores the role of technology in enhancing political intervention in China’s legal system. This investigation draws on internal court reports and central and local judicial documents, supplemented with a review of Chinese empirical scholarship.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference78 articles.
1. “Strengthening and Improving Trial Supervision and Management.”;Long;Modern Law Science,2019
2. Pressures on Chinese Judges under Xi
3. “Developing Artificially Intelligent Justice.”;Re;Stanford Technology Law Review,2019
4. Court Funding and Judicial Corruption in China
5. “The Role and Position of Trial Supervision and Management by the Court President after Delegating Power.”;Zhao;People’s Judicature,2020