Abstract
An unprecedented number of individuals with mental illness are represented in the criminal justice system. The unending growth of mentally ill populations in the justice system has led to jails and court dockets being increasingly overwhelmed with cases involving mental illness, state hospitals devoting far more beds and resources to forensic cases, and people without a criminal commitment left waiting for mental health services as forensic cases are prioritized. Although a forensic mental health evaluation is only one component of this larger system, common problems with forensic mental health evaluations can exacerbate the criminalization of persons with mental illness in many ways. This article reviews the current literature regarding issues of quality, reliability, and validity of forensic mental health evaluations, discusses the broader impact of these issues, and offers potential solutions for the field.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical)
Reference62 articles.
1. Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?
2. 36. , Roskes , personal communication, December 12, 2014
3. AAPL practice guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial;Mossman;J Am Acad Psychiatry Law,2007
4. Clinician variation in findings of competence to stand trial.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献