Advance Consent in Acute Stroke Trials: Survey of Canadian Stroke Physicians-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Advance Consent in Acute Stroke Trials: Survey of Canadian Stroke Physicians

Published:2023-02-17 Issue:1 Volume:51 Page:122-125
ISSN:0317-1671
Container-title:Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
language:en
Short-container-title:Can. J. Neurol. Sci.

Author:

Udoh Ubong^ORCID,Dewar Brian,Nicholls Stuart,Fedyk Mark,Fahed Robert,Perry Jeff,Hill Michael D.^ORCID,Menon Bijoy,Swartz Richard H.,Poppe Alexandre Y.^ORCID,Gocan Sophia^ORCID,Brehaut Jamie,Dainty Katie,Shepherd Victoria,Dowlatshahi Dar,Shamy Michel^ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Advance consent presents a potential solution to the challenge of obtaining informed consent for participation in acute stroke trials. Clinicians in stroke prevention clinics are uniquely positioned to identify and seek consent from potential stroke trial participants. To assess the acceptability of advance consent to Canadian stroke clinic physicians, we performed an online survey. We obtained 58 respondents (response rate 35%): the vast majority (82%) expressed comfort with obtaining advance consent and 92% felt that doing so would not be a significant disruption to clinic workflow. These results support further study of advance consent for acute stroke trials.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,General Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Ethical Issues of Informed Consent in Acute Stroke

2. Are Canadians Providing Advance Directives about Health Care and Research Participation in the Event of Decisional Incapacity?

3. Deferral of Consent

4. Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review

5. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects;JAMA,2013

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ‘It’s not making a decision, it’s prompting the discussions’: a qualitative study exploring stakeholders’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning (CONSULT-ADVANCE);BMC Medical Ethics;2024-07-23

2. ‘It’s not making a decision, it’s prompting the discussions’: a qualitative study exploring stakeholders’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning (CONSULT-ADVANCE);2024-04-09

3. Advance Consent in Acute Stroke Trials: Survey of Canadian Research Ethics Board Chairs;Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques;2023-07-24