Abstract
AbstractGod is thought to be eternal. Does this mean that he is timeless? Or is he, rather, omnitemporal? In this article we argue that God cannot be omnitemporal. Our starting point, which we take from Bernard Williams's article on the Makropulos Case, is the intuition that it is inappropriate for persons not to become bored after a sufficiently long sequence of time has passed. If Williams is right, then it follows that, if God were omnitemporal, he would suffer from boredom. But God is the greatest possible being and therefore cannot be bored. God, hence, is not omnitemporal. After the presentation of our argument, we address several objections by examining possible differences between human and divine persons.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Reference44 articles.
1. Helm P. (2010a) ‘Eternity’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 edition), , accessed 9 December 2011.
2. 7. Divine Eternity
3. Why immortality is not so bad
4. The Immortality Requirement for Life's meaning
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献