Abstract
AbstractIn his article, ‘Heartbreak at Hilbert's Hotel’, Landon Hedrick argues that the ‘Hilbert's Hotel Argument’ (HHA) proposed by William Lane Craig is ineffective against proponents of presentism, who include Craig himself. I show that there is no heartbreak if the Hotel and persons are constructed and generated in a certain way: there exists a ‘hotel room builder’ and a ‘customer generator’, they have been building hotel rooms and generating customers at regular time intervals as long as time exists, and the hotel rooms and customers have continued existing after they have been built and generated respectively.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Experimental implementation of the fractional-vortex Hilbert hotel;Physical Review A;2022-09-28
2. Counting to infinity, successive addition, and the length of the past;International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;2022-08-27
3. Arguments for a First Cause;The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited;2022
4. Introducing the Quest for an Explanation;The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited;2022
5. Kalām
Cosmological Argument;The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion;2021-11-16