Abstract
One of the most extensive yet least conclusive methodological debates within religious studies revolves around the question of what, precisely, the phenomenology of religion is and what contribution it can make to the study of religion. I do not intend to answer this important question here. To do so satisfactorily would require a range of historical, philosophical and methodological inquiry which would go quite beyond the bounds of a single article. My intention in this paper is, by comparison, unambitious. It is to takeoneview of what phenomenology of religion is and to consider an area outside that usually explored by students of religion which can, nonetheless, shed some light on how religions might be studied in a way which is in accordance with the phenomenology of religion so understood. What follows will offer an answer to the question of what contribution one particular understanding of phenomenology might make to the study of religion, but no attempt will be made to establish whether or not this particular understanding ought to be regarded as normative.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Reference61 articles.
1. Golding William , op. cit. (see note 5, page 68, above), p. 87.
2. Phonetic Ability and the Related Anatomy of the Newborn and Adult Human, Neanderthal Man and the Chimpanzee;Lieberman;American Anthropologist,1972
3. Belief or Anamnesis: Is a Rapprochement between History of Religions and Theology Possible?
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献