Abstract
In his article ‘A Critique of the Doctrine of Universal Salvation’, J. D. Bettis criticises the argument that all men will be saved because ‘God's love is both absolutely good and absolutely sovereign’ (p. 330). I would like to argue that either some of Bettis's criticisms are confused, or else that he is not using ‘love’ in anything like its ordinary sense. I will not attempt a full defence of universalism here, however. In particular, I will not try to defend it against the sort of criticisms Bettis says an Arminian might raise (p. 336).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Abbreviations;Barth, Origen, and Universal Salvation;2009-05-14
2. Preface. Universalism, Separationism, and the World Today;Barth, Origen, and Universal Salvation;2009-05-14
3. Dedication;Barth, Origen, and Universal Salvation;2009-05-14
4. Copyright Page;Barth, Origen, and Universal Salvation;2009-05-14