Abstract
As a preliminary, I shall clarify the kenotic position by arguing that a
position which is often called kenotic is actually a quasi-kenotic version of the
classical account, according to which Jesus had normal divine powers but chose not
to exercise them. After this preliminary, I discuss three problems with the strict
kenotic account. The first is that kenosis conflicts with the standard list of attributes
considered essential to God. The second problem is posed by the Exaltation, namely
the resumption by Jesus of normal divine powers after his life on Earth. Finally
there is the problem of how it was possible for Jesus to be the same person as the
pre-incarnate Word. My solutions to these problems constitute my defence of a
strict kenotic account of the Incarnation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Fluctuating maximal God;International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;2020-03-03
2. In Defense of Physicalist Christology;Sophia;2019-06-25
3. If anyone is in Christ – new creation!;Religious Studies;2018-10-17
4. Kenosis, omniscience, and the Anselmian concept of divinity;Religious Studies;2017-03-13
5. Modeling Mystery;Scientia et Fides;2016-04-07