Abstract
AbstractThis article provides an analytical framework for understanding why and how many authoritarian regimes have recently adopted reforms that address gender equality. I illustrate and hone the framework by tracing three policy-making processes on domestic violence in Russia, an important and least-likely case for such reforms. While recent scholarship finds the importance of international leverage, strategic actions by women’s groups, and regime interest in sidelining religious extremists, this study highlights other opportunities and agents and specifies authoritarian mechanisms such as intra-elite conflict, signaling between the autocrat and elites, and selective responsiveness. Drawing on the scholarship on authoritarian regime dynamics, policy making in Russia, and gender policy making, this study contributes to the literature on the relationship between gender and regime type by focusing on the micrologics of authoritarian policy making.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies,Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies
Reference91 articles.
1. Small Tribes, Big Gains: The Strategic Uses of Gender Quotas in the Middle East
2. Introduction
3. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment
4. Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects;Brancati;Annual Review of Political Science,2014
5. ROC (Russian Orthodox Church). 2018. “Raz”yasneniye pozitsii Patriarshey komissii po voprosam sem’i, zashchity materinstva i detstva v otnoshenii prestupleniy, sovershayemykh v semeynom okruzhenii” [Explanation of the position of the Patriarchal Commission on Family Affairs, Protection of Motherhood and Childhood in relation to crimes committed in the family environment]. June 26. http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/5227882.html (accessed January 20, 2023).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献