The Gender Gap in Political Discussion Group Attendance

Author:

Beauvais EdanaORCID

Abstract

AbstractAlthough women and men enjoy formally equal political rights in today's democracies, there are ongoing gaps in the extent to which they make use of these rights, with women underrepresented in many political practices. The gender gap in democratic participation is problematic because gendered asymmetries in participation entail collective outcomes that are less attentive to women's needs, interests, and preferences. Existing studies consider gender gaps in voting behavior and in certain forms of nonelectoral politics such as boycotting, signings a petition, or joining a protest. However, almost no work considers gendered variation in discursive politics. Do women participate in small, face-to-face political discussion groups at the same rate as men? And does gender intersect with other identities—such as ethnicity—to impact attendance at political discussion groups? I use data from the Canadian Election Study 2015 Web Survey to answer these questions. I find that women are significantly less likely to attend small-group discussions than men and that ethnicity intersects with gender in some important ways. However, I find no evidence that other social attributes—poverty or the presence of young children in the home—suppress women's participation in political discussion groups more than men's.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies,Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies

Reference81 articles.

1. The Gender Gaps in Identity and Political Attitudes among American Indians

2. Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation

3. Intersectionality as buzzword

4. Taking the Goals of Deliberation Seriously: A Differentiated View on Equality and Equity in Deliberative Designs and Processes;Beauvais;Journal of Public Deliberation,2016

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The cost of politics: how money acts as a barrier for women in politics in the Caribbean;Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes;2024-04-11

2. La question récurrente de la participation civique et de ses effets pernicieux sur les principes de justice;Lien social et Politiques;2024

3. How to study democratic backsliding;Political Psychology;2023-12

4. Effect of Avatar Clothing and User Personality on Group Dynamics in Virtual Reality;ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion, Interaction and Games;2023-11-15

5. Surviving or thriving political defeat on social media: a temporal analysis of how electoral loss exacerbates the gender gap in political expression;Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication;2023-11-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3