Abstract
AbstractKnowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) systems describe and reason with complex concepts and relations in the form of facts and rules. Unfortunately, wide deployment of KRR systems runs into the problem that domain experts have great difficulty constructing correct logical representations of their domain knowledge. Knowledge engineers can help with this construction process, but there is a deficit of such specialists. The earlier Knowledge Authoring Logic Machine (KALM) based on Controlled Natural Language (CNL) was shown to have very high accuracy for authoring facts and questions. More recently, KALMFL, a successor of KALM, replaced CNL with factual English, which is much less restrictive and requires very little training from users. However, KALMFL has limitations in representing certain types of knowledge, such as authoring rules for multi-step reasoning or understanding actions with timestamps. To address these limitations, we propose KALMRA to enable authoring of rules and actions. Our evaluation using the UTI guidelines benchmark shows that KALMRA achieves a high level of correctness (100%) on rule authoring. When used for authoring and reasoning with actions, KALMRA achieves more than 99.3% correctness on the bAbI benchmark, demonstrating its effectiveness in more sophisticated KRR jobs. Finally, we illustrate the logical reasoning capabilities of KALMRA by drawing attention to the problems faced by the recently made famous AI, ChatGPT.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Hardware and Architecture,Theoretical Computer Science,Software
Reference26 articles.
1. Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases
2. Gao, T. , Fodor, P. and Kifer, M. 2018b. Knowledge authoring for rule-based reasoning. In OTM Confederated International Conferences on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. Springer, 461–480.
3. A Logic-Based Calculus of Events
4. Le, H. , Tran, T. and Venkatesh, S. 2020. Self-attentive associative memory. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 5682–5691.
5. Baker, C. F. , Fillmore, C. J. and Lowe, J. B. 1998. The berkeley framenet project. In 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. COLING, 86–90.