Abstract
What labor rights do police workers have? How are they legally delimited? This article addresses these questions through a case study of government responses to attempts by police constables in post/colonial South Asia to express job-related grievances and establish employee unions. Drawing on ethnographic observations, interviews, and archival documents collected in India over fifteen years, the analysis demonstrates that, for more than a century, class warfare within police organizations has manifested in counter-insurgency “lawfare” between senior officials and subordinate personnel regarding whether and how the latter may collectively organize to transform their living and working conditions. It further shows how in this context law as a social field has worked to subjectify rank-and-file police as an ironically exploitable and expendable class of laborers who are always already suspect of rebelling against the state that they have sworn to serve. Through revelations of a long history of structural servitude compelling subaltern police in South Asia to do questionably legal types of labor, this study raises challenging questions about how police work has been conceived and practiced globally as “security labor” and how, moving forward, we must work to reimagine what police work is, what it can be, and what it ought to be.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Social Sciences
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. (In)security in subordination: Policing and policework in postcolonial Pakistan;Security Dialogue;2024-06-13
2. When is ethnography ‘real ethnography’?;Routledge International Handbook of Police Ethnography;2023-01-11
3. Police ethnography, extraction, and abolition;Routledge International Handbook of Police Ethnography;2023-01-11
4. Appendices;Insecure Guardians;2022-12-15
5. Conclusion;Insecure Guardians;2022-12-15