Reproducibility of a food menu to measure energy and macronutrient intakes in a laboratory and under real-life conditions

Author:

McNeil Jessica,Riou Marie-Ève,Razmjou Sahar,Cadieux Sébastien,Doucet Éric

Abstract

Given the limitations associated with the measurement of food intake, we aimed to determine the reliability of a food menu to measure energy intake (EI) and macronutrient intake within the laboratory and under free-living conditions. A total of eight men and eight women (age 25·74 (sd5·9) years, BMI 23·7 (sd2·7) kg/m2) completed three identical in-laboratory sessions (ILS) and three out-of-laboratory sessions (OLS). During the ILS, participants hadad libitumaccess to a variety of foods, which they chose from a menu every hour, for 5 h. For the OLS, the foods were chosen from the menu at the start of the day and packed into containers to bring home. There were no significant differences in total EI (6118·6 (sd2691·2), 6678·8 (sd2371·3), 6489·5 (sd2742·9) kJ; NS) between the three ILS and three OLS (6816·0 (sd2713·2), 6553·5 (sd2364·5), 6456·4 (sd3066·8) kJ; NS). Significant intraclass correlations (ICC) for total energy (r0·77,P < 0·0001), carbohydrate (r0·81,P < 0·0001), dietary fat (r0·54,P < 0·0001) and protein (r0·81,P < 0·0001) intakes for the ILS and significant ICC for total energy (r0·85,P < 0·0001), carbohydrate (0·85,P < 0·0001), dietary fat (0·72P < 0·0001) and protein (0·80,P < 0·0001) intakes for the OLS were noted. The average within-subject CV for total EI was 18·3 (sd10·0) and 16·1 (sd10·3) % for the ILS and OLS, respectively, with a pleasantness rating for foods consumed of 124 (sd14) mm out of 150 mm (83 %). Overall, the food menu produces a relatively reliable measure of EI inside and outside the laboratory. The results also underscore the difficulties in capturing a representative image of food intake given the relatively high day-to-day variation in the amount and composition of foods consumed.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3