Abstract
Alasdair MacIntyre’s critique of managerial capitalism is well known, with some arguing that MacIntyrean thought is antithetical to contemporary capitalist business. Nevertheless, substantial efforts have been taken to demonstrate how different business activities constitute MacIntyrean practices, which points to an incoherence at the heart of MacIntyrean business ethics scholarship. This article proposes a way of bridging these perspectives, suggesting a reimagined MacIntyrean approach to business that is thoroughly ‘practice-led.’ A detailed comparison of accounting and management shows that while neither are practices in ‘good order,’ they differ in significant ways: where management does not meet the criteria for a MacIntyrean practice, accounting is a ‘distorted’ practice. This leads to a categorisation of practice-led business activity, whereby the traditional tasks of management are subsumed, shared or subordinated to practices and practitioners. Insights on how this can be implemented are drawn from the ‘communities of practice’ literature and a consideration of professions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference79 articles.
1. Is forensic accounting in the United States becoming a profession?;Huber;Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting,2012
2. Once more on re-conceiving management as a domain-relative practice: A response to Sinnicks;Beabout;Business Ethics Journal Review,2014
3. Mastery of one’s domain is not the essence of management;Sinnicks;Business Ethics Journal Review,2014b
4. We ought to eat in order to work, not vice versa”: MacIntyre, practices, and the best work for humankind;Sinnicks;Journal of Business Ethics,2021
5. What more needs to be said? A beginning, although only a beginning, at saying it;MacIntyre;Analyse und Kritik,2008