Abstract
Abstract
Multiple global crises – including the pandemic, climate change, and Russia's war on Ukraine – have recently linked together in ways that are significant in scope, devastating in effect, but poorly understood. A growing number of scholars and policymakers characterize the situation as a ‘polycrisis’. Yet this neologism remains poorly defined. We provide the concept with a substantive definition, highlight its value-added in comparison to related concepts, and develop a theoretical framework to explain the causal mechanisms currently entangling many of the world's crises. In this framework, a global crisis arises when one or more fast-moving trigger events combine with slow-moving stresses to push a global system out of its established equilibrium and into a volatile and harmful state of disequilibrium. We then identify three causal pathways – common stresses, domino effects, and inter-systemic feedbacks – that can connect multiple global systems to produce synchronized crises. Drawing on current examples, we show that the polycrisis concept is a valuable tool for understanding ongoing crises, generating actionable insights, and opening avenues for future research.
Non-technical summary
The term ‘polycrisis’ appears with growing frequently to capture the interconnections between global crises, but the word lacks substantive content. In this article, we convert it from an empty buzzword into a conceptual framework and research program that enables us to better understand the causal linkages between contemporary crises. We draw upon the intersection of climate change, the covid-19 pandemic, and Russia's war in Ukraine to illustrate these causal interconnections and explore key features of the world's present polycrisis.
Technical summary
Multiple global crises – including the pandemic, climate change, and Russia's war on Ukraine – have recently linked together in ways that are significant in scope, devastating in effect, but poorly understood. A growing number of scholars and policymakers characterize the situation as a ‘polycrisis’. Yet this neologism remains poorly defined. We provide the concept with a substantive definition, highlight its value-added in comparison to related concepts, and develop a theoretical framework to explain the causal mechanisms currently entangling many of the world's crises. In this framework, a global crisis arises when one or more fast-moving trigger events combines with slow-moving stresses to push a global system out of its established equilibrium and into a volatile and harmful state of disequilibrium. We then identify three causal pathways – common stresses, domino effects, and inter-systemic feedbacks – that can connect multiple global systems to produce synchronized crises. Drawing on current examples, we show that the polycrisis concept is a valuable tool for understanding ongoing crises, generating actionable insights, and opening avenues for future research.
Social media summary
No longer a mere buzzword, the ‘polycrisis’ concept highlights causal interactions among crises to help navigate a tumultuous future.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
European Research Council
V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference109 articles.
1. How many shocks can the world take?;Walt;Foreign Policy,2022
2. Global Catastrophic Risk Institute [GCRI]. (2023). About. Global Catastrophic Risk Institute. Retrieved from https://gcrinstitute.org/about/
3. World Economic Forum [WEF]. (2007). Global risks 2007: A global risk network report (No. 150107; p. 34). Geneva: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from World Economic Forum website: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2007.pdf
4. Adelphi, & Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research [PIK]. (2020). 10 Insights on climate impacts and peace: A summary of what we know. Adelphi Research and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Retrieved from Adelphi Research and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research website: https://weatheringrisk.org/sites/default/files/document/10%20Insights%20on%20Climate%20Impacts%20and%20Peace%20Report_0.pdf
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献