Abstract
Following the 1997 general election in Britain, the New Labour government
made clear its intention to cut back and radically reform the social
security system, including Housing Benefit, an income-related housing
allowance for low-income tenants. The cost of Housing Benefit had
doubled in real terms over the previous decade and was taking up a growing
share of social security expenditure. The scheme also suffered from major
deficiencies. Drawing on recent literature on welfare state retrenchment,
this article examines why the government eventually retreated from cuts
and a wholesale reform of Housing Benefit and opted instead for a more
modest and long-term approach.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献