Abstract
This article's starting point is Glennerster et al.'s 1991 question in JSP,
20: 3 whether ‘the decisive break’ they then saw in British social policy
represented ‘A New Enlightenment or a New Leviathan’. Evidence is produced
from the policy arena of education and training (i.e., learning) to
argue that the Learning and Skills Act due for implementation from 1
April 2001 represents an example of the latter rather than the former.
The Act is a further step on the road from what was traditionally ‘a
national system of education locally administered’ to a national system
nationally administered. This is clearly seen when the post-war system of
education and training established by the 1944 Education Act is contrasted
with the new system of contracting out provision through agencies.
In presenting this contrast the article is an exercise in ‘Learning
Policy’, described as ‘a new area of social policy … [which] indicates the
concerted approach that many governments in developed countries now
take to integrate the reproduction of knowledge at all levels in the education
institutions under their control with skill formation in training in
and out of employment’ (Ainley, 1999, p. 9).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献