Abstract
Pensions are a controversial issue in Britain. During the past fifty years,
pension reforms have been challenged by the competing policies of the
Conservative Party and the Labour Party. There were differences in the
nature, scope and extent of pension policies between them: the
Conservatives encouraged private pension provision while the Labour
Party promoted state provision. Based on core principles of freedom and
personal responsibility, the Conservatives persistently over time implemented
policies in line with these beliefs. This article explores this transformation
of the post-war pension regime. An attempt is made here to
sketch out a new explanation of this transformation in drawing on recent
theories of the role of ideas and ideology in the policy process. The recent
apparent convergence in policy thinking on pensions between the Labour
Party and the Conservative Party highlights the importance of core ideological
principles.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献