Author:
Callan Tim,Nolan Brian,Whelan Christopher T.
Abstract
AbstractRingen has advocated the use of both income and deprivation criteria in identifying those excluded from society due to lack of resources, a widely accepted definition of poverty. We illustrate with Irish data how this might be done, paying particular attention to how appropriate indicators of deprivation are to be selected. The results show that employing both income and deprivation criteria rather than income alone can make a substantial difference to both the extent and composition of measured poverty. This highlights the restrictive nature of poverty conceived in terms of exclusion rather than minimum rights to resources.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference24 articles.
1. Whelan C.T. , Hannan D.F. and Creighton S. (1991), Unemployment, Poverty and Psychological Distress, Economic and Social Research Institute, General Research Series No. 150.
2. Consensual Approaches to Poverty Lines and Social Security
3. Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Poverty
Cited by
142 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Patterns of Multidimensional Poverty in the United States;Annals of the American Association of Geographers;2023-11-06
2. Scarcity and intertemporal choice.;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology;2023-11
3. Spatiotemporal trend analysis of climate indices for the European continent;Journal of Water and Climate Change;2023-08-08
4. Bibliography;Breaking the Poverty Code;2023-07-24
5. Poverty Volatility and Tax Revenue Instability in Developing Countries;Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences;2023-07-07