Author:
HOGGETT PAUL,WILKINSON HEN,BEEDELL PHEOBE
Abstract
AbstractThe role of the emotions in the framing of welfare policies is still relatively underexplored. This article examines the role of resentment in the construction of a particular form of ‘anti-welfare populism’ advanced by the Coalition Government in the UK after 2010. We argue that UK political parties have appropriated the discourse of fairness to promote fundamentally divisive policies which have been popular with large sections of the electorate including, paradoxically, many poorer voters. In focus group research in white working class communities in the UK undertaken just before the 2010 General Election, resentments related to perceived unfairness and loss emerged as very strong themes among our respondents. We examine such resentments in terms of an underlying ‘structure of feeling’ which fuels the reactionary populism seen in ‘anti-welfare’ discourses. These promote increasingly conditional and punitive forms of welfare in countries experiencing austerity, such as the UK, creating rivalries rather than building solidarities amongst those who ‘have little’ and drawing attention away from greater inequalities.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference56 articles.
1. Policy Exchange (2011), ‘Just deserts: attitudes to fairness, poverty and welfare reform’, Policy Exchange, London, www.policyexchange.org.uk/publications/publication.cgi?id=237 (accessed 17 October 2011).
2. Why Americans Hate Welfare
3. Welfare-to-work, Agency and Personal Responsibility
4. The Cycle of Deprivation: Myths and Misconceptions
Cited by
97 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献