Abstract
Enthusiasm for the expansion of markets in welfare reflects the
currency of
assumptions derived from rational choice theory among policy-makers. This
article reviews recent evidence from the ESRC's Economic Beliefs
and
Behaviour programme that calls into question the basic tenet of the
rational
choice approach – that individual choices are driven by instrumental
rationality
– and argues that welfare markets require a normative framework in
which trust plays an important role. Experimental evidence from recent
work in economic psychology indicates that individuals often display a
level
of trust in market interactions that is hard to explain on the basis of
simple
rationality, but that such trust is fragile and easily undermined by egoistic
action. Lack of attention to the normative issues which the rational choice
approach fails to capture may lead to the design of markets which are inefficient
in meeting the aims of policy-makers and which deplete the moral
legacy on which many welfare markets in practice depend.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
85 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献