Author:
Ayuso Mercedes,Bravo Jorge M.,Holzmann Robert
Abstract
AbstractIn many policy areas it is essential to use the best estimates of life expectancy, but it is vital to most areas of pension policy. This paper presents the conceptual differences between static period and dynamic cohort mortality tables, estimates the differences in life expectancy for Portugal and Spain, and compares official estimates of both life expectancy estimates for Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States for 1981, 2010, and 2060. These comparisons reveal major differences between period and cohort life expectancy in and between countries and across years. The implications of using wrong estimates for pension policy, including financial sustainability, are explored.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference51 articles.
1. Valuation of longevity-linked life annuities;Bravo;Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,2018
2. On stochastic mortality modeling;Plat;Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,2009
3. Addressing Longevity’ Heterogeneity in Pension Scheme Design
4. Measuring the longevity risk in mortality projections;Brouhns;Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Actuaries,2002b
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献