1. The Dictionnaire des sciences médicales, X, 178–239, in its article on pain by Dr. Renauldin, notes the cultural variations in pain response, and goes on to discuss the connections between pain, climate, temperament, sex, age, passions, occupation and so on: ‘In general, the man who leads a hard and fatiguing life, feels pain less vividly, than the sybarite or the effeminate man who is wounded by the fall of a leaf.’
2. Bion J. , ‘Est-il utile de tromper le peuple,’ in Images dupeuple…, 187–99. The Berlin Academy of Sciences and Belles-lettres in 1780 sponsored a competition on this question. According to Beguelin, who acted as referee, those who took the affirmative did so on the grounds that a radical and sudden improvement in popular enlightenment was unlikely. It therefore followed that policies were needed to prevent the misfortunes that the people themselves would create through their own ignorance. The two sides to the question, Bion argues, epitomized two antagonistic methods and hopes: the one stressed the educative and controlled function of the elites, while the other apotheosized the autonomous will of the people. Castillon, author of a critique of Holbach's Système de la nature, feared the sudden dispersal of error. Some errors, he wrote, could be useful and some truths could be too sad. Progress consisted for him in a movement from large to smaller errors. This position is quite clearly identical with the view of the physician I have cited.
3. L'art de guerir. Médecine savante et Médecine populaire dans la France de 1790;Goubert;Annales E.S.C.,1977