Abstract
How best might one address the relationship between trade and state building in early modern South Asia? The question is hardly a new one. To some, like Anand Ram ‘Mukhlis’ (d. 1751), a Khatri from northern India who, though not Muslim, had been educated in Persian letters and accounting (siyâgat), trade was more honourableandsafer than statecraft or government. The fortunes of the nobility were fluctuating ones, and the means by which they had been accumulated were of a questionable legitimacy. Doubts of this sort did not of course prevent his Khatri brethren from entering into government service during the later Mughal period, and several of them can be counted among thea'yân(notables) of the reign of the Mughal, Muhammad Shah (1719–48) (Alam 1986:169–75). They maintained a tradition begun in the reign of Ak-bar with the famous Raja Todar Mal (d. 1589), also a Khatri from the Punjab.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Cited by
106 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Domination, Resistance, and Trade: The Portuguese, Oman, and Kanara on the Indian Ocean;ASIAN REV WORLD HIS;2024
2. Hajj across Empires;ASIAN CONNECT;2024-01-31
3. Connective Dimensionality;The Routledge Handbook of the History and Sociology of Ideas;2023-08-24
4. Revisiting “Racial Capitalism”;European Journal of Sociology;2023-08
5. The Arghūn State in Qandahar and the New World Economy, 1479–1522;Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient;2023-03-28