Abstract
AbstractThis essay describes the politics of voluntary isolation, an emerging category of indigeneity predicated on a form of human life that exists outside of history, the market, and wider networks of social connection. It traces a recent controversy around one such “isolated” population—Ayoreo-speaking people in the Paraguayan Gran Chaco—to suggest how these politics of isolation may represent a new regime of what Didier Fassin has called “biolegitimacy,” or the uneven political parsing and authorization of valid human life, within global formations of indigeneity. Here, I identify how international human rights law, multiculturalist state policies, humanitarian NGO programs, and genetic science all share an investment in the moral defense of isolated life. I explore how this investment may divide the kind of humanity authorized or claimed as “indigenous” into opposing legitimacies that are set against one another and vertically ranked. The essay argues that what is at stake in this process is not merely a new technique of the self or the enduring romance of the primitive, but the redistribution of the meaning and value assigned to those domains of human life imagined in opposition to social relation itself.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Reference123 articles.
1. Multiculturalism in Latin America
2. Amnesty International. 2010. Paraguay: Raid on NGO May Be in Reprisal for Its Public Criticism of Scientific Expedition. Public Pronouncement AMR 45/007/2010, 6 Dec. At: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR45/007/2010/en/cecfdc6d-7f76-44e-afa8-860cf868340b/amr450072010en.pdf.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献