Abstract
Debates in constitutional conventions in the United States in 1787 and Australia in 1897 reveal similarities and differences that illuminate the process by which nations became increasingly meaningful forms of social organization. Although the tone of these debates tended to be technical and pragmatic, focusing on specific concerns about the machinery of “good government,” convention delegates showed in their assumptions, their omissions, and in the claims and comparisons they repeated, what they were coming to perceive as commonalities. Claims about what identified the new nations were part of the repertoire of debate used by delegates as they addressed their tasks. So the conventions distilled ideas available to political elites about what was taken to be distinctive about and shared by prospective citizens.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Reference104 articles.
1. The "Great National Discussion": The Discourse of Politics in 1787
2. Black fellow citizens: Aborigines and the commonwealth Franchise∗
3. Let Justice Be Our Guide: A Reconsideration of ‘True Federalism’ at the Constitutional Convention;Lloyd;Political Science Reviewer,1987
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献