Abstract
AbstractThis special issue provides several perspectives on the potential and limits of judicial risk regulation as a mechanism to redress actual and perceived regulatory failures. Central to this inquiry is the legitimacy of the court system to act as a risk regulator, specifically as compared to governmental actors. This article focuses on the question of institutional competency of juridical risk regulators from a law and economics (“L&E”) perspective. L&E scholarship will be used to help to understand the relative strengths and weaknesses of courts as risk regulators and helps us decide when courts may act as substitute risk regulators and when they are better positioned as complements.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference103 articles.
1. Regulering van onzekere risico’s via public interest litigation?;Enneking;Nederlands Juristenblad,2014
2. Duty in Tort Law: An Economic Approach;Hylton;Fordham Law Review,2006
3. Politicized Science
4. Tort law and internalization: The gap between private loss and social cost
5. Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis;Greif;The American Economic Review,1998
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献