Abstract
The purposes of this study are to test whether the processing of subject relative (SR) clauses is easier than that of object relative (OR) clauses in Turkish and to investigate whether the comprehension of SRs can be better explained by the linear distance hypothesis or structural distance hypothesis (SDH). The question is examined in two groups of second language (L2) learners of different proficiency levels and a few agrammatics expected to show a similar pattern. Each participant is asked to comprehend 15 sentences containing SRs and ORs via a picture selection task. The results indicate that comprehension of SRs is easier than that of ORs for intermediate level L2 learners, whereas there is no significant difference between the types of relative clauses for early learners. Another result is that early learners produce errors similar to those of agrammatics, which are explained through trace deletion and referential strategy. These findings on Turkish provide significant support for the SDH.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Psychology,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference33 articles.
1. Kornfilt J. (1984).Case marking, agreement and empty categories in Turkish.PhD dissertation,Harvard University.
2. A Restrictive Theory of Agrammatic Comprehension
3. Özsoy S. (1994).Türkçede ortaç yapisi.Dilbilim Araştırmaları,1994,21–30.
4. Slobin D. (1986).The acquisiton and use of relative clauses in Turkish and Indo-European languages.In D. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds.),Studies in Turkish linguistics(pp. 273–297).Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
5. Aarssen J. (1996).Relating events in two languages: Acquisition of cohensive devices by Turkish–Dutch bilingual children at school age.Tilburg, The Netherlands:Tilburg University Press.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献