From Province to Protectorate to State? Speculation on the Impact of Kosovo's Genesis upon the Doctrines of International Law

Author:

Goodwin Morag

Abstract

The province of Kosovo – 2 million people in 11,000 square kilometres of territory nestled between Serbia to the North and Albania and Macedonia to the South – was thrust into the international limelight when Serbian actions to repress Kosovo Albanian calls for independence made it a subject of international concern at the end of the 1990s. While Kosovo is not unique in becoming well-known for suffering the repressive actions of a parent state, and while it has not even enjoyed the distinction of being the only territorial administration of its time, it appears to be unique in its (potential) impact on the doctrines of international law. On a number of levels, the international community's response to the situation created by Milosevic's actions and NATO's intervention threaten to call fundamental pillars of the post-World War II order into question. It is too early to speculate conclusively on whether the NATO action in KosovosansSecurity Council approval in some measure paved the way for an emerging doctrine of “humanitarian intervention” that, in turn, opened the door to the illegal invasion of Iraq. It seems not implausible to suggest that the apparent success of unauthorised military intervention in Kosovo in stopping mass human rights violations emboldened politicians on both sides of the Atlantic in opting for a moral path over the formally legal one. In any event, grounded as they are in that history, the final status talks on the future of Kosovo represent a serious challenge to the current framing of the international order. It is these issues that this symposium wished to raise and examine.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law

Reference58 articles.

1. Crawford, supra note 9 at 417. This is of course not to suggest that there have not been contested situations of secession, but that the former ‘parent’ state has reconciled itself to the new situation and the new state has been accepted for membership of the United Nations.

2. Opinion No. 2 (reproduced), 3 EJIL 183–4 (1993).

3. The so-called ‘safeguard clause’ of the 1970 Declaration was repeated, in slightly different language, in the 1993 Vienna Declaration. United Nations World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, 25 June 1993, 32 ILM 1661, 1665.

4. The 1920 Treaty of Trianon imposed upon Hungary at the end of the First World War saw millions of Hungarians left outside the new rump state of Hungary once large swathes of territory were divided up among neighbours. This “re-distribution” provoked a bitterness that is still very much part of Hungarian identity 85 years and many more upheavals later.

5. For a statement that the response of the Kosovar Albanians to disappointment will see UNMIK lose control of the province used as an argument for a swift conclusion to the talks in favour of independence, see International Crisis Group, Kosovo Status: Delay is Risky (Brussels/ Pristina, 10 November 2006) available at http://www.crisisgroup.org/

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3