1. See Venzke, in this issue.
2. Id. at 592 (“Whatever standard is chosen has a good chance of developing an adoptive momentum by virtue of the advantages regulators see in being a part of the ‘network’ of regulators applying the same schema to their regulated industry”); Malloy Michael P. , Emerging International Regime of Financial Services Regulation, 18 Transnational Lawyer 329, 347–349 (2005) (“[Basel II] seems to represent the emergence of a new kind of source of law: an international administrative practice involving rule proposal for public comment, revision in light of public comments, and adoption, implementation, and enforcement at the national level”).
3. Zaring (note 15), at 580–585.
4. For a Committee debate about what role the Committee and the WTO have in standard-setting, see S/FIN/M/42, 12 November 2003, paras. 49–69.
5. Leroux Eric H. , Trade in Financial Services under the World Trade Organization, 36 Journal of World Trade 413, 432 (2002).