Abstract
This Article examines the relationship between the developing European Union (EU) system of banking supervision and the theories of constitutional pluralism. It questions the remaining epistemic, explanatory, and normative value of these theories with regard to the EU system of banking supervision. The argument is broken down into three parts. First, the Article briefly describes the system of banking supervision in the European Union and the pluralist challenges that it spurs. Second, it schematically maps out the leading theories of constitutional pluralism to test, by way of their application to the field of EU banking supervision, their epistemic, explanatory, and normative value. Finally, to the extent that this value has diminished, the Article offers another pluralist theory, not a constitutional one, which could supplement the identified epistemic, explanatory, and normative gaps. This is a theory of administrative pluralism.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference90 articles.
1. What follows draws closely on Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond 2–9 (Matej Avbelj & Jan Komärek eds., 2012).
2. Mattias Kumm, The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship Between Constitutionalism in and Beyond the State, in Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International law and Global Governance 258 ( Dunoff Jeffrey L. & Trachtman Joel P. eds., 2009).
3. European Banking Authority, http://www.eba.europa.eu/ (last visited Sept. 16, 2016).
4. Kingsbury, supra note 67.
5. Neil Walker, Europe's Constitutional Engagement, 18 Ratio Juris 387, 398 (2005).